A Database of Drosophila Genes & Genomes

FB2008_07, released August 8, 2008
 

Aberration Dmel\Df(3R)E40

General Information
SymbolDmel\Df(3R)E40SpeciesD. melanogaster
NameFlyBase IDFBab0002563
Feature typechromosomal_deletionCreated / Updated2006-08-22/2006-08-22
Formalized genetic data rod << bk1 << Med << bk2
Sequence coordinates
Deleted segment100C5--100F5
Duplicated segment
Computed Breakpoints include 100C5;100F1-100F5
Breakpoints Inherited  
hide Nature of the Aberration
Cytological Order
Progenitor
Mutagen
Class of aberration (relative to progenitor)
Breakpoints
100C5-100D1;100F1-100F5
100C5-100D1;100F
100C5;100F1-100F5
Causes alleles
Carries alleles
Transposon Insertions
Genetic mapping information
Comments
hide Comments on Cytology
Left limit of break 1 from polytene analysis (FBrf0048198) Right limit of break 1 from polytene analysis (citation unavailable) Limits of break 2 from polytene analysis (FBrf0048198)
 
Right breakpoint is at the tip of 3R.
hide Molecularly Mapped Breakpoints
 
hide Sequence Crossreferences
DDBJ /
EMBL /
GenBank
DNA sequence
Protein sequence
Name
 
hide Gene Deletion & Duplication Data
hide Genes Deleted / Disrupted
Complementation Data
Completely deleted / disrupted
Molecular Data
hide Genes NOT Deleted / Disrupted
Complementation Data
Molecular Data
hide Genes Duplicated
Complementation Data
Molecular Data
hide Genes NOT Duplicated
Complementation Data
Molecular Data
hide Related Comments
hide Phenotypic Data
In combination with other aberrations
NOT in combination with other aberrations
Deficient embryos show a variably penetrant mutant midgut phenotype: central constriction absent.
Homozygous embryos do not complete head involution or dorsal closure, and tracheae are not connected. Midgut constrictions are incomplete, Malpighian tubules have a variable diameter along their length and the hindgut is sometimes shorter than normal.
Homozygous lethal.
Strictly maternal enhancer of dpphr4 lethality. The lethal interaction is due to a loss of dorsal-most fates in the embryos, demonstrated by loss of amnioserosa cells.
hide Position Effect Variegation Data
  
hide Stocks ( 0 )
hide Notes on Origin
Discoverer
hide Balancer / Genotype Variants of the Aberration
    hide Separable Components
      hide Other Comments
      hide Synonyms & Secondary IDs ( 2 )
      Reported As
      Symbol Synonym
      Name Synonym
      Secondary FlyBase IDs
        hide References ( 13 )
        Research paper
        Takaesu et al., 2005, Development 132(21): 4883--4894
        DNA-binding domain mutations in SMAD genes yield dominant-negative proteins or a neomorphic protein that can activate WG target genes in Drosophila. [FBrf0190324]
        Das et al., 1998, Development 125(8): 1519--1528
        The Drosophila gene Medea demonstrates the requirement for different classes of Smads in dpp signaling. [FBrf0102615]
        Hudson et al., 1998, Development 125(8): 1407--1420
        The Drosophila Medea gene is required downstream of dpp and encodes a functional homolog of human Smad4. [FBrf0102608]
        Wisotzkey et al., 1998, Development 125(8): 1433--1445
        Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is differentially required to potentiate DPP responses. [FBrf0102610]
        Yamamoto et al., 1996, Roux Arch. dev. Biol. 205(5-6): 215--224
        Genetic interactions of pokkuri with seven in absentia, tramtrack and downstream components of the sevenless pathway in R7 photoreceptor induction in Drosophila melanogaster. [FBrf0086690]
        Bilder and Scott, 1995, Genetics 141(3): 1087--1100
        Genomic regions required for morphogenesis of the Drosophila embryonic midgut. [FBrf0083777]
        Harbecke and Lengyel, 1995, Roux Arch. dev. Biol. 204(5): 308--329
        Genes controlling posterior gut development in the Drosophila embryo. [FBrf0082073]
        Raftery et al., 1995, Genetics 139(1): 241--254
        Genetic screens to identify elements of the decapentaplegic signaling pathway in Drosophila. [FBrf0079237]
        Bishop, 1992, Genetics 132: 1063--1069
        Evidence for intrinsic differences in the formation of chromatin domains in Drosophila melanogaster. [FBrf0056200]
        Tartof et al., 1989, Dev. Genet. 10: 162--176
        Towards an understanding of position effect variegation. [FBrf0049515]
        Locke et al., 1988, Genetics 120: 181--198
        Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect. [FBrf0048198]
        Personal communication to FlyBase
        Raftery, 1995.4.6, [title not yet available]
        [title not yet available] [FBrf0086254]
        FlyBase analysis
        FlyBase, 2007, En masse symbol-based assigment of Aberration Class with respect to wild type.
        En masse symbol-based assigment of Aberration Class with respect to wild type. [FBrf0191808]