|Computed Breakpoints include||87D11-87D13;87E5|
|Member of large scale dataset(s)|
What does this section display?
This section contains items that were added to this record for each release. It currently only tracks new links between this FlyBase report and other FlyBase data classes (e.g. genes, references, stocks) or controlled vocabulary terms (e.g. GO, anatomy terms).
What does this section not display?
This section does not currently display links that were removed or gene model changes.
Click the icon below to subscribe to this FlyBase record and receive updates automatically through your feed reader.
|All updates||Click here to see a list of all updates to this record from FB2010_08 and on.|
|Nature of the Aberration|
|Class of aberration (relative to progenitor)|
|Formalized genetic data||snk << bk1 << Hsc70-2 << l(3)87Ef << bk2 << l(3)87Eg|
|Genetic mapping information|
Molecular coordinates of distal breakpoint between +79.5 and +90.5, of proximal breakpoint between -160.5 and -157.5 (Spierer et al., 1983). break at -160 (Gausz et al., 1986)
|Comments on Cytology|
|Gene Deletion & Duplication Data|
|Genes Deleted / Disrupted|
|Completely deleted / disrupted|
|Genes NOT Deleted / Disrupted|
|Genes NOT Duplicated|
|In combination with other aberrations|
|NOT in combination with other aberrations|
or the CNS phenotype. The construct shows that the midline cells are disorganised compared to wild type at stage 11 and at stage 13 are clustered near the ventral surface of the embryo leading to the collapse of the two lateral CNS hemiganglia and fusion of the longitudinal connectives. The presence of Ecol\lacZsim.7.8 construct fails to rescue lethality
|Stocks ( 0 )|
|Notes on Origin|
|Balancer / Genotype Variants of the Aberration|
|Synonyms & Secondary IDs ( 2 )|
|Secondary FlyBase IDs|
|References ( 22 )|
|Generate a list of|
|List References by type|
|Recent research papers (0)|
|All research papers listed in FlyBase were published before 2011|