|Computed Breakpoints include||1B3;18B8-18B9|
|Member of large scale dataset(s)|
What does this section display?
This section contains items that were added to this record for each release. It currently only tracks new links between this FlyBase report and other FlyBase data classes (e.g. genes, references, stocks) or controlled vocabulary terms (e.g. GO, anatomy terms).
What does this section not display?
This section does not currently display links that were removed or gene model changes.
Click the icon below to subscribe to this FlyBase record and receive updates automatically through your feed reader.
|All updates||Click here to see a list of all updates to this record from FB2010_08 and on.|
|Nature of the Aberration|
|Class of aberration (relative to progenitor)|
|Formalized genetic data||l(1)sc << bk1 << pcl << coc << bk2 << car|
|Genetic mapping information|
Breakpoint(s) molecularly mapped
Breakpoint between DNA coordinates +5.6 and +4.7 (Campuzano et al., 1985). 0 is an arbitrarily chosen EcoRI site in the scβ segment of ASC; positive values to the left (Carramolino, Ruiz-Gomez, Guererro, Campuzano and Modolell, 1982, EMBO J. 1: 1185-92).
|Comments on Cytology|
Left break irreconcilable with Muller's genetic evidence (FBrf0003098) that the left break of In(1)sc9 is to the right of that of In(1)sc4.
|Gene Deletion & Duplication Data|
|Genes Deleted / Disrupted|
|Completely deleted / disrupted|
|Genes NOT Deleted / Disrupted|
|Genes NOT Duplicated|
|In combination with other aberrations|
|NOT in combination with other aberrations|
Homozygous females show an almost complete loss of tergite chaetae.
|Stocks ( 2 )|
|Notes on Origin|
|Balancer / Genotype Variants of the Aberration|
|Synonyms & Secondary IDs ( 3 )|
|Secondary FlyBase IDs|
|References ( 14 )|