Allele Dmel\ru1
| General Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | Dmel\ru1 | Species | D. melanogaster |
| Name | FlyBase ID | FBal0014832 | |
| Feature type | allele | Created / Updated | 2006-08-22/2006-08-22 |
| Associated gene | Dmel\ru | ||
| Allele class | hypomorph | ||
| Mutagen | spontaneous | ||
Nature of the Allele
| |||
| Allele class | |||
| Mutagen | |||
| Mapped Features and Mutations | |||
Type Symbol & Location Additional Notes References | |||
| Associated Sequence Data | |||
| DDBJ
/
EMBL / GenBank | DNA sequence Protein sequence Name | ||
| UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot | |||
| UniProtKB/TrEMBL | |||
| Progenitor genotype | |||
| Nature of the lesion | Statement Reference | ||
| Assay mode | |||
| Carried on aberration | |||
| Cytology | |||
Phenotypic Data
| |||
Phenotypic Class
| |||
Phenotype Manifest In
| |||
Detailed Description
| |||
Statement Reference may overlap wild type Eyes small and rough, have irregular facets and hairs and have black specks from erupted facets. Expression variable; sometimes overlaps wild type. SEM study by Stumm-Tegethoff and Dick (1974). The regular array of facets in the eyes of homozygotes produces a rough eye phenotype. There is variable loss of photoreceptors in these mutant eyes, however few defects if any are seen in the recruitment of photoreceptors. Cone cells are dramatically under-recruited, and some pigment cells are seen to be missing. Heterozygous adults exhibit misrotated ommatidia and minor photoreceptor recruitment defects. In stage 16 ru1 mutant embryos, a significant number of ganglionic branch trachea fail to turn posteriorly and dorsally at the ventral midline and instead cross the midline or remain lingering on it. | |||
Interactions
| |||
|
|||
Phenotypic Class
| |||
Enhanced by | |||
Statement Reference | |||
Enhancer of | |||
Statement Reference | |||
NOT Enhancer of | |||
Statement Reference | |||
NOT Suppressor of | |||
Statement Reference | |||
Other | |||
Statement Reference | |||
Phenotype Manifest In
| |||
Enhanced by | |||
Statement Reference ru1 has photoreceptor cell R8 | somatic clone | cell non-autonomous phenotype, enhanceable by rho7M43 | |||
Enhancer of | |||
Statement Reference ru1 is an enhancer of photoreceptor cell R8 | somatic clone | cell non-autonomous phenotype of rho7M43 | |||
NOT Enhancer of | |||
Statement Reference | |||
NOT Suppressor of | |||
Statement Reference | |||
Other | |||
Statement Reference | |||
Additional Comments
| |||
Genetic Interactions
| |||
Statement Reference ru1/Df(3L)ru-K1 flies have slightly diminished eyes and the facets are rough. Clones of doubly mutant for rho7M43 and ru1 do not survive into adult eyes. When mosaic ommatidia are studied, no mutant R8 photoreceptor cells are seen, while mutant photoreceptor cells R1-7 are seen in between a third and a half of mosaic ommatidia. When imaginal discs are examined, an absence of non-R8 photoreceptor cells are seen, and also a complete loss of cone cells. In these clones an increased level of apoptosis is also seen. Apoptotic cells are seen in two main zones, one just ahead of the advancing morphogenetic furrow, and one towards the posterior of the clone. In rho7M43; ru1 double mutant somatic clones in the 3rd instar eye disc, photoreceptors R2-R5 fail to undergo or differentiation. Within rho7M43; ru1 double mutant somatic clones there is a failure of G1 arrest in the furrow: all cells except R8s re-enter the cell cycle. Most of these cells fail to progress past G2: most remain in G2 arrest posterior to column 3, but both cells in early mitosis and postmitotic cells can be seen near boundaries with wild-type cells. In rho7M43; ru1 double mutant clones in the eye disc, only R8 photoreceptor cells differentiate In rho7M43; ru1; sensE2 triple mutant clones, no photoreceptors differentiate except for a few photoreceptors near the clonal boundary, presumably rescued non-autonomously by neighboring wild-type cell. No rescue of photoreceptor development is seen when these triple mutant clones are made in a rox63 homozygous background. 69% of cuticles from rho7M43; ru1 double homozygous embryos have at least one denticle belt fusion, compared with 30% in rhounspecified homozygotes. Other aspects of the cuticle phenotype in these double mutants are no stronger than those in rhounspecified embryos. (Note, while the authors do not name an rho allele for this analysis, they do claim to have used a null allele.) Denticle belt fusions in the cuticles of rho7M43; ru1 double homozygous embryos are suppressed by Egfr::tort4021E.hs.sev or Ras85DV12.Scer\UAS with Scer\GAL4prd.RG1, and enhanced by EgfrDN.Scer\UAS (P{UAS-Egfr.DN}29-77-1), Ras85DN17.Scer\UAS or phlK497M.Scer\UAS with Scer\GAL4prd.RG1. The penetrance of denticle belt fusions in the cuticles of rho7M43; ru1 double homozygous embryos is reduced from just under 60% to less than 20% by Df(3L)H99/Df(3L)H99. The extra photoreceptor cell phenotype of argos[Δ7] clones is enhanced in argos[Δ7] Gug[14967] clones, with a greater percentage of ommatidia showing supernumerary photoreceptor cells. In contrast, ru[1] rho[7M43] Gug[14967] argos[Δ7] mutant clones lack photoreceptor cells. | |||
Xenogenetic Interactions
| |||
Statement Reference | |||
Complementation & Rescue Data
| |||
| Rescued by | |||
| Comments | |||
Stocks
( 248 ) | |||
| Bloomington | 575 3256 1116 581 6882 | ||
| Kyoto | 106944 105729 | ||
Notes on Origin
| |||
| Discoverer | Sturtevant, 14th Feb. 1919. | ||
Synonyms & Secondary IDs
( 3 ) | |||
| Reported As | |||
| Symbol Synonym | rho-31 ru | ||
| Name Synonym | |||
| Secondary FlyBase IDs | |||
References
( 16 ) | |||
| Research paper |
| ||
| Personal communication to FlyBase |
| ||
| FlyBase analysis |
| ||
| Book |
| ||
Nature of the Allele