Gene Dmel\Adh
| General Information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | Dmel\Adh | Species | D. melanogaster | |
| Name | Alcohol dehydrogenase | Annotation symbol | CG3481 | |
| Feature type | protein_coding_gene | FlyBase ID | FBgn0000055 | |
| Created / Updated | 2005-09-09/2005-09-09 | |||
| Genomic Location | ||||
| Chromosome (arm) | 2L | Recombination map | 2-50.1 | |
| Cytogenetic map | 35B3-35B3 | Sequence location | 2L:14,615,555..14,618,902 [+] | |
| Map ( GBrowse ) |
| |||
Summary Information
| ||||
|
Automatically generated summary
See sections below for more information | The gene Alcohol dehydrogenase is referred to in FlyBase by the symbol Adh (CG3481, FBgn0000055). It has the cytological map location 35B3. Its sequence location is 2L:14615555..14618902. Its molecular function is described as: alcohol dehydrogenase activity; GTP binding; 7S RNA binding. It is involved in the biological processes: ethanol oxidation; behavioral response to ethanol; alcohol metabolic process; SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane. 584 alleles are reported. No phenotypic data is available. It has 5 annotated transcripts and 5 annotated polypeptides. | |||
Phenotypic Description from the Red Book (Lindsley & Zimm 1992)
| ||||
| Gene/Allele symbols may differ from current usage | Adh: Alcohol dehydrogenase (M. Ashburner)
Structural gene for alcohol dehydrogenase [ADH (EC
1.1.1.1)]. Natural populations are polymorphic for three
electrophoretic alleles (AdhF, AdhS, AdhF-ChD) and for three
rarer electrophoretic alleles (AdhUS, AdhF', AdhUF). The frequency of the AdhF allele increases, at the expense of AdhS,
with increasing latitude in both northern and southern hemispheres [Johnson and Schaffer, 1973, Biochem. Genet.
10: 149-63; Vigue and Johnson, 1973, Biochem. Genet.
9: 213-27; Wilks, Gibson, Oakeshott and Chambers, 1980,
Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 33: 575-85; Anderson, 1981, Genetic Studies of Drosophila Populations (Gibson and Oakes, eds.). Australian National University Press, pp. 237-50; Anderson and
Chambers, 1982, Evolution 36: 86-96].
Confers resistance to ethanol; flies lacking ADH rapidly
become intoxicated and eventually die on exposure to ethanol
(Grell, Jacobson and Murphy, 1968, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci
151: 441-45; Vigue and Sofer, 1976, Biochem. Genet.
14: 127-135; David, Bocquet, Arens and Fouillet, 1976,
Biochem. Genet. 14: 989-97). However, ethanol sensitivity is
complex since even Adh nulls are more resistant to ethanol
when young than when old (Vigue and Sofer, 1976; Tsubota).
Adh+ flies are killed by low concentrations of unsaturated
secondary alcohols (e.g. 1-penten-3-ol; 1-pentyn-3-ol) but
not by unsaturated primary alcohols (e.g. 1-penten-1-ol)
(Sofer and Hatkoff, 1972, Genetics 72: 545-49), presumably
due to the formation of toxic ketones. This allows the chemical selection of Adh nulls (Sofer and Hatkoff, 1972;
O'Donnell, Gerace, Leister and Sofer, 1975, Genetics 79: 73-83). ADH may play a metabolic role independent of alcohol
detoxication, i.e. in the metabolism of higher alcohols (see
Winberg, Thatcher and McKinley-McKee, 1982, Biochem. Biophys.
Acta 704: 7-16). ADH also catalyses the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate (Heinstra, Eisses, Schoonen, Aben, de
Winter, van de Horst, van Marrewijk, Beenakkers, Scharloo and
Thorig, 1983, Genetica 60: 129-37; Moxon, Holmes, Parsons,
Irving, and Doddrell, 1985, Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
80B: 525-35).
Specific activity of ADH changes with development, with
peaks at the end of the third larval instar and about four
days after eclosion (Ursprung, Sofer and Burroughs, 1970,
Wilhelm Roux's Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 164: 201-08;
Dunn, Wilson and Jacobson, 1969, J. Exp. Zool. 171: 185-90;
Leibenguth, Rammo and Dubiczky, 1979, Wilhelm Roux's Arch.
Dev. Biol. 187: 81-88; Maroni and Stamey, 1983, DIS 59: 77-79; Anderson and McDonald, 1981, Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.
23: 305-13). Most of the activity is in the larval fat body
and gut and the adult fat body (Ursprung, Sofer and Burroughs). Maternal inheritance of ADH by embryos and larvae
(O'Donnell et al.; Leibenguth et al.). Half life of ADH-F in
vivo estimated as 55.3 hours (Anderson and McDonald, 1981,
Biochem. Genet. 19: 411-19). Not expressed in SL2 tissue
culture cells, but transfected cloned gene is (Benyajati and
Dray, 1984, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1701-05).
Ethanol tolerance usually correlated with ADH activity and
polymorphic experimental populations exposed to ethanol usually show an increase in the frequency AdhF (McDonald and
Avise, 1976, Biochem. Genet. 14: 347-55; Cavener and Clegg,
1978, Genetics 90: 629-44; van Delden, Kamping and van Dijk,
1975, Experientia 31: 418-19; Oakeshott, Gibson, Anderson and
Champ, 1980, Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 33: 105-14; McDonald,
Chambers, David and Ayala, 1977, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
74: 4562-66). Flies carrying AdhF tend to be more resistant
than those carrying only AdhS to ethanol [Kamping and van Delden, 1978, Biochem. Genet. 16: 541-55; Ainsley and Kitto,
1975, Isozymes (C. Markert, ed.). Academic Press, Vol. II,
pp. 733-43; Briscoe, Robertson and Malpica, 1975, Nature (London) 253: 148-49].
Electrophoresis of homozygous genotypes usually reveals
three interconvertable isozymes [Ursprung and Leone; Johnson
and Denniston; Grell et al., 1965; Ursprung and Carlin, 1968,
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 151: 456-75; Jacobson, Murphy and Hartmann, 1970, J. Biol. Chem. 245: 1075-83; Jacobson and
Pfuderer, 1970, J. Biol. Chem. 245: 3938-44; Jacobson, Murphy
and Ortiz, 1972, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 149: 22-35; Knopp
and Jacobson, 1972, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 149: 36-41;
Schwartz, Gerace, O'Donnell and Sofer, 1975, Isoenzymes (C.
Markert, ed.). Academic Press, Vol. I, pp. 725-51]. These
vary in activity and stability, the most cathodal being more
active, but less stable, than the more anodal forms. They
probably result from the binding of 0, 1 or 2 moles per mole
of a NAD+ addition complex with a carbonyl compound [Schwartz
and Sofer, 1976, Nature (London) 263: 129-31; Schwartz,
O'Donnell and Sofer, 1979, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 194: 365-78; Winberg, Thatcher and McKinley-McKee, 1983, Biochem.
Genet. 21: 63-80]. Feeding flies acetone, propan-2-ol, or
3-hydroxy-butanone, for example, converts isozymes to most
anodal form and results in loss of enzyme activity in vitro
and in vivo (Schwartz and Sofer, 1976; Papel, Henderson, van
Herrewege, David and Sofer, 1979, Biochem. Genet. 17: 533-63). ADH has been purified (Sofer and Ursprung, 1968, J.
Biol. Chem. 243: 3118-25; Schwartz et al., 1975; Thatcher,
1977, Biochem. J. 163: 317-23; Leigh Brown and Lee, 1979,
Biochem. J. 179: 479-82; Juan and Gonzalez-Duarte, 1980,
Biochem. J. 189: 105-10; Elliot and Knopp, 1975, Methods
Enzymol. 41: 374-79; Chambers, 1984, Biochem. Genet.
22: 529-50). It is a homodimer with monomeric subunit molecular weight of 27500 daltons (Thatcher, 1980, Biochem. J.
187: 875-83); molecular extinction coefficient 4.8 X 104
liter/mol/cm (Juan and Gonzalez-Duarte, for ADH-S). Complete
amino acid sequence determined by Thatcher (1980; see also
Schwartz and Jornvall, 1976, Europ. J. Biochem. 68: 159-68;
Auffret, Williams and Thatcher, 1978, FEBS Lett. 90: 324-26;
Benyajati, Place, Powers, and Sofer, 1981, Proc. Nat. Acad.
Sci. USA 78: 2317-21; Chambers, Laver, Campbell and Gibson,
1981, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3103-07) with secondary
structure predictions (Thatcher and Sawyer, 1980, Biochem J.
187: 884-86; Benyajati et al., 1981). Limited homology in
supposed catalytic region with ribitol dehydrogenase of Klebsiella (Jornvall, Persson and Jeffry, 1981, Proc. Nat. Acad.
Sci. USA 78: 4226-30).
ADH shows a broad substrate specificity but is more active
(by at least a factor of 5) with secondary than primary
alcohols and shows highest activity to 3-6 carbon alcohols
(Sofer and Ursprung; Thatcher and Camfield, 1977, Winberg et
al., 1982, Chambers et al.). Differences in substrate specificity, kinetic constants and stability of different electrophoretic variants often reported (Anderson and McDonald, 1983,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4798-802). Considerable heterogeneity in the specific activity of ADH within and between
different AdhF and AdhS strains, though AdhS strains tend to
be lower than AdhF [Day, Hillier and Clarke, 1974, Biochem.
Genet. 11: 141-53, 155-65; Day and Needham, 1974, Biochem.
Genet. 11: 167-75; Gibson, 1970, Nature (London) 227: 959-61; Gibson, Chambers, Wilkes and Oakeshott, 1980, Aust. J.
Biol. Sci. 33: 479-89; Gibson and Miklovitch, 1971, Experientia 27: 99-100; Kreitman, 1980, Genetics 95: 467-75; Oakeshott, 1976, Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 29: 365-73; Sampsell, 1977,
Biochem. Genet. 15: 971-88; Sampsell and Sims, 1982, Nature
(London) 296: 853-55; Thorig, Schoone and Scharloo, 1975;
Biochem. Genet. 13: 721-31; Vigue and Johnson; Hewitt, Pipkin, Williams and Chakrabartty, 1974, J. Hered. 65: 141-44;
Ward, 1974, Biochem. Genet. 12: 449-58; Ward, 1975, Genet.
Res. 26: 81-93; Maroni, Laurie-Ahlberg, Adams and Wilton,
1982, Genetics 101: 431-66; Rasmuson, Nilson and Zeppezauer,
1966, Hereditas 56: 313-16; Clarke, Camfield, Garvin and
Pitts, 1979, Nature (London) 180: 517-18; Laurie-Ahlberg,
Maroni, Bewley, Lucchesi and Weil, 1980, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
USA 77: 1073-77; Barnes and Birley, 1978, Heredity 40: 51-57; Barnes and Birley, 1978, Biochem. Genet. 16: 155-65;
McDonald and Ayala, 1978, Genetics 89: 371-88; McDonald et
al., 1980; Lewis and Gibson, 1978, Biochem. Genet. 16: 159-70]. With the exception of the studies by Thatcher and Sheik
(1981, Biochem. J. 197: 111-17), Winberg et al. (1982),
McDonald, Anderson and Santos (1980, Genetics 95: 1013-22);
Eisses, Schoonen, Aben, Scharloo, and Thorig (1985, Mol. Gen.
Genet. 199: 76-81) and Moxon et al. (1985), these were all
done with crude extracts and not purified enzyme. Thatcher
and Sheikh find the relative thermostabilities to be ADH-S >
ADH-F > ADH-n5 > ADH-D. ADH-S shows slower dissociation of
NADH from NADN-enzyme complex than ADH-F (Winberg, Hovik, and
McKinley-McKee, 1985, Biochem. Genet. 23: 205-16).
ADH is not a metalloenzyme (Place, Powers and Sofer, 1980,
Fed. Proc. 39: 1640); but, paradoxically, is inhibited by
certain metal ion chelators, e.g. pyrazole (Place, Powers and
Sofer; Winberg et al., 1982; Moxon et al., 1985).
Utilization of ethanol as an energy source (van Herrewege
and David, 1974, C. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 279D: 335-38; van
Herrewege, David and Grantham, 1980, Experientia 36: 846-47;
Libion-Mannaert, Delcour, Deltombe-Lietaert, Lenelle-Montfort
and Elens, 1976, Experentia 32: 22-23) depends on ADH
activity (David, Bocquet, van Herrewege, Fouillet and Arens,
1978, Biochem. Genet. 16: 203-11). AdhF homozygotes usually
show a better ability to survive on ethanol as a sole energy
source than AdhS homozygotes (Daly and Clarke, 1981, Heredity
46: 219-26; Anderson, McDonald and Santos, 1981, Experientia
37: 463-64). AdhF and AdhS homozygotes also show behavioural
differences in their response to ethanol (Parsons, 1977
Oecologia 30: 141-46; Cavener, 1979, Behav. Genet. 9: 359-65; Gelan and McDonald, 1980, Behav. Genet. 10: 237-49;
Hougonto, Lietaert, Libion-Mannaert, Feytmans and Elens, 1982,
Genetica 58: 121-28; Parsons, 1980, Behav. Genet. 10: 183-90; Parsons, 1980, Experientia 36: 1070-71).
D. simulans enzyme monomers form heterodimers with those of
D. melanogaster (E.H. Grell); D. simulans enzyme purified
(Juan and Gonzalez-Duarte, 1981, Biochem. J. 195: 61-69).
Sequence of D. simulans ADH (from DNA) similar to that of AdhS
with following changes: ser1 -> ala1; gln82 -> lys82; ile184
-> val184 (Bodmer and Ashburner, 1984, Nature 309: 425-30).
D. simulans and D. melanogaster enzymes differentially regulated in hybrids (Dickenson, Rowan, and Brennan, 1984, Heredity 52: 215-25). The Adh genes from D. orena and D. mauritiana have also been sequenced (Bodmer and Ashburner), and
those of D. erecta, D. teissieri and D. yakuba mapped with
restriction enzymes (Langley, Montgomery and Quattlebaum,
1982, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 5631-35).
| |||
Detailed Mapping Data
| ||||
| FlyBase Computed Cytological Location | ||||
Cytogenetic map Evidence for location 35B3-35B3
Limits computationally determined from genome sequence between P{EP}elBEP2039&P{PZ}osprJ571 and P{lacW}Su(H)k07904
| ||||
| Experimentally Determined Cytological Location | ||||
Cytogenetic map Notes References 35B-35B (determined by in situ hybridisation)
35B-35B (determined by in situ hybridisation)
35B3-35B3 (determined by in situ hybridisation)
35B3-35B5 (determined by in situ hybridisation)
| ||||
| Experimentally Determined Recombination Data | ||||
| Location | 2-50.1 2-50.10 | |||
| Left of (cM) | ||||
| Right of (cM) | ||||
| Notes | Maps to the left of Tp(2;2)Sco. Extremely close to Tp(2;2)Sco. Maps 0.12cM to the left of Tp(2;2)Sco. | |||
| Molecular Map Data | ||||
Gene Order (in direction of increasing cytology)
References In direction of increasing cytology: osp- Adh+ Adhr+ osp- In direction of increasing cytology: osp- Adh+ Adhr+ BG:DS09219.1- BG:DS07721.1+ osp- In direction of increasing cytology: osp- Adh+ osp- In direction of increasing cytology: Adh+ Adhr+ Gene Order (overall orientation not stated) References | ||||
Gene Model & Products
| ||||
Please see the
GBrowse view of
Dmel\Adh
for information on other features
| ||||
| Comments on Gene Model | ||||
gene_with_dicistronic_processed_transcript ; SO:0000722 | ||||
Transcript Data
| ||||
| Annotated Transcripts | ||||
Name FlyBase ID RefSeq ID Length (nt) Associated CDS (aa) FBtr0100589
1071
256 FBtr0100590
1016
256 FBtr0100591
2077
256 FBtr0100593
2022
256 FBtr0100594
1245
256 | ||||
| Additional Transcript Data & Comments | ||||
| Reported size (kB) | 1.5 (northern blot) 0.760 (sequence analysis) 1.150 (northern blot) 1.0 (northern blot) 1.1 (northern blot) 1.120 (northern blot) | |||
| Comments | The Adh distal and proximal transcripts accumulate in
the same cells at some stages. The longer Adh+R
transcripts (ranging from 1150 to 2000 base pairs) are specifically detected in
RNA from adult tissue. These longer RNAs are due to the use of an alternative
promoter in adult flies. | |||
| External Data | ||||
| Crossreferences | ||||
Polypeptide Data
| ||||
| Annotated Polypeptides | ||||
Name FlyBase ID
Predicted MW (kD)
Length (aa)
Theoretical pI
RefSeq ID
GenBank protein
FBpp0100045
27.7
256
7.57
FBpp0100047
27.7
256
7.57
FBpp0100048
27.7
256
7.57
FBpp0100050
27.7
256
7.57
FBpp0100051
27.7
256
7.57
| ||||
| Additional Polypeptide Data & Comments | ||||
| Reported size (kD) | 27 (kD) 25 (kD) 255 (aa) 24 (kD) | |||
| Comments | In vitro transcribed protein from a genomic Adh clone (gAC1 and sAC1) which was bound by an immobilized Adh antibody was run on a gel to show one protein product with an approximate size of 24kD. No Adh protein was recovered from an Actin clone or without the addition of DNA. | |||
| External Data | ||||
| Linkouts | ||||
| Crossreferences | InterPro
domains - A database of protein families, domains, and functional sites
• Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase SDR (IPR002198)
Insect alcohol dehydrogenase family (IPR002424)
Insect alcohol dehydrogenase (IPR002425)
NAD(P)-binding (IPR016040)
TRANSFAC
- Eukaryotic transcription factors, their genomic binding sites, and DNA-binding profiles
•
| |||
Sequences Consistent with the Gene Model
| ||||
| DDBJ
/
EMBL / GenBank | DNA sequence Protein sequence Name | |||
| UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot | ||||
| UniProtKB/TrEMBL | ||||
| Maps to | ||||
| Does NOT map to | ||||
| Identified with | ||||
Mapped Features & Mutations
| ||||
Please see
GBrowse
or insertion reports for information on insertions of transgenic
constructs and features not listed here
Type Symbol & Location Additional Notes References deletion Adh[nLA2] 2L:14,616,629..14,616,664 comment=Reported as a deletion from amino acids 75 to 86; annotated endpoints approximate. evidence=experimental deletion Adh[nLA252] 2L:14,617,026..14,617,046 comment=Reported as a deletion from amino acids 184 to 190; annotated endpoints approximate. evidence=experimental deletion Adh[nLA249] 2L:14,617,047..14,617,064 comment=Reported as a deletion from amino acids 191 to 196; annotated endpoints approximate. evidence=experimental point mutation Adh[n14] 2L:14,616,339..14,616,339 comment=Mutation of the start codon; induced on an Adh[F] chromosome. evidence=experimental na_change=A14616339T pr_change=M1L|Adh-PC,M1L|Adh-PI,M1L|Adh-PH,M1L|Adh-PF,M1 L|Adh-PE reported_na_change=A778T point mutation Adh[nBR4] 2L:14,616,341..14,616,341 comment=Mutation of the start codon; induced on an Adh[F] chromosome. evidence=experimental na_change=G14616341A pr_change=M1I|Adh-PC,M1I|Adh-PI,M1I|Adh-PH,M1I|Adh-PF,M1 I|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G780A point mutation Adh[1Met] 2L:14,616,341..14,616,341 comment=Mutation in the start codon. evidence=experimental na_change=G14616341A pr_change=M1I|Adh-PC,M1I|Adh-PI,M1I|Adh-PH,M1I|Adh-PF,M1 I|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G3A point mutation Adh[A14V] 2L:14,616,379..14,616,379 evidence=experimental na_change=C14616379T pr_change=A14V|Adh-PC,A14V|Adh-PI,A14V|Adh-PH,A14V|Adh-P F,A14V|Adh-PE reported_na_change=C41T reported_pr_change=A14V point mutation Adh[n11] 2L:14,616,382..14,616,382 comment=Induced on an Adh[F]@ chromosome. evidence=experimental na_change=G14616382A pr_change=G15D|Adh-PC,G15D|Adh-PI,G15D|Adh-PH,G15D|Adh-P F,G15D|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G821A reported_pr_change=G15D point mutation Adh[nBR18] 2L:14,616,387..14,616,387 comment=Induced on an Adh[F] chromosome. evidence=experimental na_change=G14616387A pr_change=G17R|Adh-PC,G17R|Adh-PI,G17R|Adh-PH,G17R|Adh-P F,G17R|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G826A reported_pr_change=G17R point mutation Adh[G17R] 2L:14,616,387..14,616,387 evidence=experimental na_change=G14616387A pr_change=G17R|Adh-PC,G17R|Adh-PI,G17R|Adh-PH,G17R|Adh-P F,G17R|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G49A reported_pr_change=G17R point mutation Adh[G17E] 2L:14,616,388..14,616,388 evidence=experimental na_change=G14616388A pr_change=G17E|Adh-PC,G17E|Adh-PI,G17E|Adh-PH,G17E|Adh-P F,G17E|Adh-PE reported_na_change=G50A reported_pr_change=G17E point mutation Adh[nBR51] 2L:14,616,438..14,616,438 comment=Splice donor mutation evidence=experimental na_change=G14616438A reported_na_change=G?A point mutation Adh[nBR114] 2L:14,616,595..14,616,595 evidence=experimental na_change=T14616595A pr_change=Y64|Adh-PC,Y64|Adh-PI,Y64|Adh-PH,Y64|Adh-P F,Y64@|Adh-PE reported_na_change=T?A reported_pr_change=Y64@ point mutation Adh[n4] 2L:14,616,650..14,616,650 evidence=experimental na_change=C14616650T pr_change=Q83|Adh-PC,Q83|Adh-PI,Q83|Adh-PH,Q83|Adh-P F,Q83@|Adh-PE reported_na_change=C312T reported_pr_change=Q83@ point mutation Adh[G93R]< | ||||
