Home
Reference Report
| Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Citation | Kerrigan, L.A., Kadonaga, J.T. (1992). Periodic binding of individual core histones to DNA: inadvertent purification of the core histone H2B as a putative enhancer-binding factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 20(24): 6673--6680. (Export to RIS) | ||
| FlyBase ID | FBrf0057424 | ||
| Publication Type | Research paper | ||
| PubMed ID | 1480489 | ||
| PubMed Abstract | By using a DNase I footprinting assay, we have purified a factor by DNA affinity chromatography that binds to the minimal enhancer region of the Drosophila knirps gene and subsequently identified the protein as the core histone H2B. This inadvertent purification of a core histone as a putative sequence-specific DNA binding protein was due to a previously unknown property of H2B to interact with DNA in a periodic manner. Moreover, we found that each of the individual core histones, but not histone H1 or high mobility group protein 1, bound to the knirps enhancer to give a repetitive DNase I footprint pattern with a periodicity of about 10 base pairs, which is approximately one turn of the DNA helix. In addition, preparations containing the core histones H2A-H2B or H3-H4 yielded identical periodic DNase I footprint patterns on several different promoter and enhancer regions. These findings suggest that there are periodic, homotypic interactions between DNA-bound core histones that result from an alteration of the overall DNA structure such as the curvature rather than a specific sequence. We have also shown that histones H2A-H2B can repress initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. The phenomena described here may reflect histone-DNA interactions in non-nucleosomal stretches of chromatin and could be involved in some aspects of either rotational or translational positioning of nucleosomes. Furthermore, these findings indicate that a repeated 10 bp DNase I ladder, which has previously been considered to be a property of an intact nucleosome, can also be generated with subnucleosomal components. It will thus be necessary to reevaluate the criteria applied to the analysis of nucleosomes both in vivo and in vitro. | ||
| DOI | |||
| Related Publication(s) | |||
Recent Updates
|
|||
| Description |
What does this section display?
This section contains items that were added to this record for each release.
It currently only tracks new links between this FlyBase report and other
FlyBase data classes (e.g. genes, references, stocks) or controlled
vocabulary terms (e.g. GO, anatomy terms).
What does this section not display?
This section does not currently display links that were removed or gene model changes.
|
||
| Update Feed |
Click the icon below to subscribe to this FlyBase record and receive updates automatically through your
feed reader.
|
||
| FB2013_03 | |||
| FB2013_02 | |||
| All updates | Click here to see a list of all updates to this record from FB2010_08 and on. | ||
|
Associated Information
|
|||
| Comments | |||
| Associated Files | |||
|
Other Information
|
|||
| Secondary IDs | |||
| Language of Publication | English | ||
| Additional Languages of Abstract | |||
| Also Published As | |||
|
Parent Publication
|
|||
| Publication Type | Journal | ||
| Abbreviation | Nucleic Acids Res. | ||
| Title | Nucleic Acids Research | ||
| Publication Year | 1974- | ||
| ISBN/ISSN | 0305-1048 | ||
|
Data from Reference
|
|||
| Genes (8)
|
|||
| Sequence features (5)
|
|||