>
> >> >PC-ness conflicts/queries
> >> >01528 05287 PC bloom has both - reserve 01528?
> >>
> >> .. Lasko thinks 01528 lethal is elsewhere. like 39E. I
> >> don't know. Roote says discard it. the problem was that k08613 noncomps
> >> both 01528 and 05287.
> >
> >In that case I should get Kathy to put a note in the stock listing for
> >01528 saying this. Do you mean Roote says discard 01528?
>
> Yes a note from Lasko, the lethality for the chromosome 'l(2)01528 looks
> like 39E because outside TW84 but inside TW65 (and TW161)'. Roote or some
> buddy of his David Huen, couldn't assign it in 38F so they too thought it
> elsewhere.