|Citation||Beaton, A. (1998.3.3). l(2)01528. (Export to RIS)|
|Publication Type||Personal communication to FlyBase|
|Text of Personal Communication||
> From abeaton@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Wed Nov 05 23:20:28 1997
>>From ag24@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Mon Oct 27 13:26:07 1997
>>>From abeaton@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Sun Oct 26 01:45:44 1997
>>>>From ag24@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Fri Oct 17 23:15:02 1997
>>>>01528 05287 PC bloom has both - reserve 01528?
>>>>>> this one's a bitch. Lasko thinks 01528 lethal is elsewhere. like 39E. I
>>> don't know. Roote says discard it. the problem was that k08613 noncomps
>>> both 01528 and 05287.
>>>>In that case I should get Kathy to put a note in the stock listing for
>>01528 saying this. Do you mean Roote says discard 01528?
>> Yes a note from Lasko, the lethality for the chromosome 'l(2)01528 looks
> like 39E because outside TW84 but inside TW65 (and TW161)'. Roote or some
> buddy of his David Huen, couldn't assign it in 38F so they too thought it
What does this section display?
What does this section not display?
This section does not currently display links that were removed or gene model changes.
|All updates||Click here to see a list of all updates to this record from FB2010_08 and on.|
|Language of Publication||English|
|Additional Languages of Abstract|
|Also Published As|
|Data from Reference|