Reference Report
| Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Citation | Ligoxygakis, P., Bray, S.J., Apidianakis, Y., Delidakis, C. (1999). Ectopic expression of individual E(spl) genes has differential effects on different cell fate decisions and underscores the biphasic requirement for notch activity in wing margin establishment in Drosophila. Development 126(10): 2205--2214. (Export to RIS) | ||
| FlyBase ID | FBrf0108430 | ||
| Publication Type | Research paper | ||
| PubMed ID | 10207145 | ||
| PubMed Abstract | A common consequence of Notch signalling in Drosophila is the transcriptional activation of seven Enhancer of split [E(spl)] genes, which encode a family of closely related basic-helix-loop-helix transcriptional repressors. Different E(spl) proteins can functionally substitute for each other, hampering loss-of-function genetic analysis and raising the question of whether any specialization exists within the family. We expressed each individual E(spl) gene using the GAL4-UAS system in order to analyse their effect in a number of cell fate decisions taking place in the wing imaginal disk. We focussed on sensory organ precursor determination, wing vein determination and wing pattern formation. All of the E(spl) proteins affect the first two processes in the same way, namely they antagonize neural precursor and vein fates. Yet, the efficacy of this antagonism is quite distinct: E(spl)mbeta has the strongest vein suppression effect, whereas E(spl)m8 and E(spl)m7 are the most active bristle suppressors. During wing patterning, Notch activity orchestrates a complex sequence of events that define the dorsoventral boundary of the wing. We have discerned two phases within this process based on the sensitivity of N loss-of-function phenotypes to concomitant expression of E(spl) genes. E(spl) proteins are initially involved in repression of the vg quadrant enhancer, whereas later they appear to relay the Notch signal that triggers activation of cut expression. Of the seven proteins, E(spl)mgamma is most active in both of these processes. In conclusion, E(spl) proteins have partially redundant functions, yet they have evolved distinct preferences in implementing different cell fate decisions, which closely match their individual normal expression patterns. | ||
| DOI | |||
| Related Publication(s) | |||
Recent Updates
|
|||
| Description |
What does this section display?
This section contains items that were added to this record for each release.
It currently only tracks new links between this FlyBase report and other
FlyBase data classes (e.g. genes, references, stocks) or controlled
vocabulary terms (e.g. GO, anatomy terms).
What does this section not display?
This section does not currently display links that were removed or gene model changes.
|
||
| Update Feed |
Click the icon below to subscribe to this FlyBase record and receive updates automatically through your
feed reader.
|
||
| FB2013_03 | |||
| FB2013_02 | |||
| All updates | Click here to see a list of all updates to this record from FB2010_08 and on. | ||
Associated Information
|
|||
| Comments | |||
| Associated Files | |||
Other Information
|
|||
| Secondary IDs | |||
| Language of Publication | English | ||
| Additional Languages of Abstract | |||
| Also Published As | |||
Parent Publication
|
|||
| Publication Type | Journal | ||
| Abbreviation | Development | ||
| Title | Development | ||
| Publication Year | 1987- | ||
| ISBN/ISSN | 0950-1991 | ||
Data from Reference
|
|||
Aberrations (2)
|
|||
Alleles (21)
|
|||
|
|||
Constructs (11)
|
|||
Genes (15)
|
|||
Insertions (6)
|
|||
Recent Updates