Subject: 	Re: GS2038
Dear  Steven,
I confirmed that GS2038 was mapped to scabrous, not CG9328. I don't  
know why it happened. The genome sequence available at that time was  
limited, and maybe we picked up wrong information.  I appreciate it  
if you could correct the information in FlyBase. Thanks very much.
Toshiro
On 2007/03/16, at  20:21 , Steven Marygold wrote:
> Dear Toshiro,
>
>
> I am curating a recent paper from the new journal 'Fly', namely "A
> Drosophila Overexpression Screen for Modifiers of Rho Signalling in
> Cytokinesis" (from Rob Saint's lab), for the FlyBase records.  They  
> use
> several GS lines in this paper, including GS2038.  They say that this
> line affects scabrous (located at 49C3), which agrees with the
> information on your DGSP website.  However, we already have GS2038 in
> our files as affecting CG9328 (located at 38E10) from Table 2 of the
> original Toba et al 1999 Genetics paper.
>
> Do you know how I should resolve this problem? Which insertion should
> really have the symbol 'GS2038'?  And what should the other  
> insertion be
> called?
>
>
> Many thanks for your time,
>
> Steven (for FlyBase).