FB2026_02 , released June 18, 2026
Reference Report
Open Close
Reference
Citation
Delidakis, C., Schweisguth, F., Lai, E., Bray, S. (2005.10.10). mind-bomb gene symbol. 
FlyBase ID
FBrf0188698
Publication Type
Personal communication to FlyBase
Abstract
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Text of Personal Communication
Dear Sarah, Christos, Gerry, and Francois,
The mind-bomb gene (FBgn0036558) is in FlyBase at the moment with both
a symbol and full name of 'mind-bomb'. This is not terribly
satisfactory \- it ought to have a short symbol. In papers and
abstracts it has been referred to as D-mib, and (in this year's EDRC
abstract book) as Mib1. Valid symbols are not prefixed with D for
Drosophila, and mib is already in existence as a symbol for FBgn0002744
('miniature bristles') so we (FB) haven't been able to use mib as the symbol.
Mib1 as a symbol is unique \- though it has only this year appeared in
an abstract. Gene symbols should only be capitalised when they are
named for a product or molecular characteristic and I have a feeling
that the 'mind-bomb' name comes from a phenotypic characteristic
(correct me if I'm wrong here).
mib1 is also available, so perhaps the best solution would be to change
the symbol from 'mind-bomb' to 'mib1' and full name from 'mind-bomb' to
'mind bomb 1'. That seems lucid, do you agree?
If not, is there a better solution that everyone might be in favor of?
It is unusual to change symbols/names in FB, and we only do it if there
is agreement by everyone working on the gene at the time \- so it is
with some trepidation I start the debate, but it is time that the gene
got a decent symbol \- I think we'd all agree on that.
With best regards,
Rachel.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rachel Drysdale.
FlyBase (Cambridge),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subject: Re: mind-bomb gene symbol
Dear Rachel, Francois, Sarah and Gerry
I agree with the name mib1 \- especially since there exists a mind bomb
paralogue (CG17492), which could accordingly be named mib2. Alternatively,
similar mammalian genes are named mind bomb and skeletrophin, respectively
(by BLASTP on mouse proteins), so we could use the names mind bomb1 and
skeletrophin for the Drosophila genes. I tend to favour the simpler mib1,
mib2 terminology, which is directly indicative of their structural similarity.
Best regards
Christos
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Christos Delidakis
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, FoRTH
Vassilika Vouton
GR-71110, Heraklion, Greece
Subject: Re: mind-bomb gene symbol
Dear Rachel,
I agree with your suggestion to name the mind-bomb gene (FBgn0036558):
'mind bomb 1'/'mib1' (full name/abbreviation). This nomenclature would
particularly make sense if we could also have CG17492 named: 'mind bomb
2'/'mib2' as suggested by Christos. Can we decide on this also now?
Best,
Francois
Subject: Re: mind-bomb gene symbol
I agree with renaming 'mind bomb 1'/'mib1' and 'mind bomb2'/'mib2'.
regards,
eric
Eric Lai
Assistant Member, Sloan-Kettering Institute
521 Rockefeller Research Labs
1275 York Avenue, Box 252
New York, NY 10021
Subject: Re: mind-bomb gene symbol
No objections, suggestions are fine with me,
S.
DOI
Associated Information
Comments
Associated Files
Other Information
Secondary IDs
    Language of Publication
    English
    Additional Languages of Abstract
    Parent Publication
    Publication Type
    Abbreviation
    Title
    ISBN/ISSN
    Data From Reference
    Genes (2)