Abstract
The ability to learn from past experiences to inform future decision making is crucial for humans and animals alike. One question with important implications for adaptive decision making is whether we learn about the absolute values of cues we encounter (how good or bad?) or about their relative values (how much better or worse than the alternative?). Humans have been shown to use relative value learning, even when it leads to suboptimal decisions. In this study, we ask whether insects employ absolute or relative value learning. Using the larvae of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, we designed associative odour-taste learning experiments to distinguish both kinds of learning and found that larvae learn about the relative rather than the absolute values of both rewards and punishments, irrespective of the number and sequence of training trials. This suggests that relative value learning is a facility shared across the animal kingdom from maggots to humans and can be accomplished even by small insect brains. Given the potential of D. melanogaster as a model organism for in-depth neurobiological analyses, our study opens up an opportunity to reveal the detailed mechanisms underlying relative value learning.
