Michael.
The sequences under accession \#'s
U85024-34 are not Cdc42. They are for unidentified cDNA's that were
selected by hybridization to a cosmid that served as a genetic duplication
for a screen we performed (Fehon et al. 1997. Genetics, in press). In other
words, they are partial sequences (EST's) that correspond to genes for
which we are likely to have isolated mutants already. I put them in the
database so that if anyone ever clones these cDNA's again they will know
that we have already isolated mutations in the corresponding genes.
Hope this makes sense. Let me know if it doesn't.
Rick
===========================
Subject: Re: Help Flybase
Michael.
Here are the groupings for these clones (based on cross-hybridization). The
one problem I have with the naming scheme for the clones that you mentioned
is that we have already adopted similar names for the unknown genetic
complementation groups from the screen (ie. l(1)18DEa, l(1)18DEb,
l(1)18DEc) per FlyBase conventions. I am worried that if the clones are
named similarly, then people will assume that clone-a corresponds to
complementation group-a, etc. We do not know that this is the case! Is
there a way to avoid this potential confusion?
Group 1
>U85024	clone 14.511R
>U85025	clone 2.4R
>U85026	clone 2.4U
>U85027	clone 5.42R
Group 2
>U85028	clone 21.31R
>U85029	clone 21.31U
Group 3
>U85030	clone 6.4R
>U85031	clone 6.4U
Group 4
>U85032	clone 8.1R
Group 5
>U85033	clone 9.421R
>U85034	clone 9.421U
Cheers,
Rick.