>
>Hi Hugo,
>
>.
>
>The difficulty is with the gene 'L30' that you suggest it hits. (I
>gather you confirmed this in mail to Eleanor a few months back.) We
>have no such gene, though we do have a gene RpL7 which Prosite say has
>the 'Ribosomal protein L30 signature'. We have no cytology for that
>gene. Is that the one whose sequence you matched (EMBL X15109) ?
>
>Cheers, Aubrey
>
>
>>
>>But the difficulty is with the gene 'L30' that you suggest it hits. (I
>>gather you confirmed this in mail to Eleanor a few months back.) We
>>have no such gene, though we do have a gene RpL7 which Prosite say has
>>the 'Ribosomal protein L30 signature'. We have no cytology for that
>>gene. Is that the one whose sequence you matched (EMBL X15109) ?
>
>I'll check again with the tech. The sequence of the cDNA is not deposited
>and I could deposit it, I think. It's certainly L30 as it is very
>conserved.
>
>Hugo
>
>Hi Aubrey,
>
>The story on 99/18 is complex and I don't know if we are not waisting time,
>but for the record, here is what I found out.
>
>The CyO balancer carries a mutation in numb which is not associated with a
>P-element.
>
>Second, the mapping data are ambiguous. Most slides show a signal at at
>36E/F. However, one slide showed a signal at 56F.
>
>Third, the gene that we isolated is very homologous to L30 and is certainly
>the true L30 protein of Drosophila.
>
>Fourth, the L30 maps to 36E/F.
>
.
>
>Hugo