FlyBase Allele Report: Dmel\osk[1]

General Information

Symbol

Dmel\osk¹

Species

D. melanogaster

Name

FlyBase ID

FBal0013303

Feature type

allele

Associated gene

Dmel\osk

Associated Insertion(s)

Carried in Construct

Also Known As

osk⁵⁴

Key Links

Genomic Maps

JBrowse

Allele class

amorphic allele - genetic evidence

Mutagen

ethyl methanesulfonate

Nature of the Allele

Allele class

amorphic allele - genetic evidence

(Gavis and Lehmann, 1992)

Mutagen

ethyl methanesulfonate

(Tearle and Nusslein-Volhard, 1987)

Progenitor genotype

Cytology

Description

Nonsense mutation.

(Kim-Ha et al., 1995)

Nonsense codon in the amino terminal region.

(Markussen et al., 1995)

An insertion of GTGAGTAG at 861A causes a novel stop codon at codon 180. Nucleotide substitution: G652A (silent substitution).

(Kim-Ha et al., 1991)

Mutations Mapped to the Genome

Curation Data

Type

Location

Additional Notes

References

deletion

3R:8,935,678..8,935,678 [+]

Comment:

Insertion of seven bases including an in frame stop codon. Translation terminates at aa180.

(Kim-Ha et al., 1991)

Variant Molecular Consequences

Associated Sequence Data

DDBJ / EMBL / GenBank

DNA sequence

Protein sequence

UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot

UniProtKB/TrEMBL

Expression Data

Reporter Expression

Additional Information

Statement

Reference

Marker for

Reflects expression of

Reporter construct used in assay

Human Disease Associations

Disease Ontology (DO) Annotations

Models Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )

Disease

Evidence

References

Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )

Disease

Interaction

References

Comments on Models/Modifiers Based on Experimental Evidence ( 0 )

Disease-implicated variant(s)

Phenotypic Data

Phenotypic Class

decreased cell number | embryonic stage 11

(Suyama et al., 2009)

grandchildless | dominant

(Suyama et al., 2009)

lethal | maternal effect | recessive

(Ephrussi et al., 1991, Lehmann and Nusslein-Volhard, 1991)

lethal - all die during embryonic stage | maternal effect (with osk^A87)

(Szuperak et al., 2005)

some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect (with osk^A87)

(Szuperak et al., 2005)

Phenotype Manifest In

embryo (with Df(3R)p-XT103), with osk^M139L

(Beckett and Baylies, 2006)

embryonic/first instar larval cuticle (with osk⁹)

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

embryonic abdomen (with osk¹⁸⁷)

(Jenny et al., 2006)

embryonic abdomen (with osk^A87)

(Jenny et al., 2006)

embryonic myoblast (with Df(3R)p-XT103), with osk^M139L

(Beckett and Baylies, 2006)

filamentous actin | oogenesis (with Df(3R)p-XT103)

(Lee et al., 2020)

germline cell

(Kim-Ha et al., 1991)

germline cell (with osk¹⁸⁷)

(Jenny et al., 2006)

germline cell (with osk^A87)

(Jenny et al., 2006)

microtubule & oocyte | oogenesis stage S9 (with Df(3R)p-XT103)

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

oocyte (with Df(3R)p-XT103)

(Lee et al., 2020)

presumptive embryonic/larval muscle system (with Df(3R)p-XT103), with osk^M139L

(Beckett and Baylies, 2006)

primordial germ cell

(Ephrussi and Lehmann, 1992)

primordial germ cell (with Df(3R)p-XT103)

(Morais-de-Sá et al., 2013)

primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11

(Suyama et al., 2009)

ventral denticle belt (with osk⁹)

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

Detailed Description

Statement

Reference

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 females lay fewer eggs per day than wild type.

(Tsai et al., 2014)

Embryos from osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 mutant mothers exhibit an increase in the number of pole cells.

(Morais-de-Sá et al., 2013)

Stage 10b oocytes in osk¹/osk⁵ females do not have long F-actin projections in the posterior region, in contrast to wild type.

(Tanaka et al., 2011)

The progeny of osk¹/+ develop no germline (grandchildless phenotype) at very low phenotype. Stage 11 embryos have an average of 23 pole cells, reduced from an average of 33 pole cells seen in wildtype embryos.

(Suyama et al., 2009)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 oocytes show preferential uptake of the FM4-64 dye at the oocyte posterior at stage 8 (as occurs in wild-type oocytes), but in stage 10 mutant oocytes, FM-64 dye uptake is distributed uniformly around the oocyte cortex.

(Tanaka and Nakamura, 2008)

Embryos from osk⁹/osk¹ mothers have a typical posterior group phenotype with 0-4 denticle belts.

In stage 9 oocytes from osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 females, the accumulation of microtubule plus ends in the posterior of the oocyte is weakened or fails to occur.

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

osk^M139L; osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 embryos express only the long osk isoform. These embryos show patterning defects and a "twisted phenotype". Muscle development is defective with embryos showing a dramatic reduction in the number of muscles, a large number of unfused myoblasts and defects in muscle morphology.

(Beckett and Baylies, 2006)

Embryos derived from osk¹/+ females have an average of 25 pole cells/embryo (compared to 33 in the wild-type).

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

One copy of osk¹ causes the formation of 10-15 pole cells.

(Ephrussi and Lehmann, 1992)

Strong abdominal defect.

(Ephrussi et al., 1991)

Lack posterior body pattern elements and germ cells.

(Kim-Ha et al., 1991)

Absence of posterior pole plasm, polar granules and pole cells.

(Lehmann and Nusslein-Volhard, 1991)

External Data

Linkouts

Interactions

Show genetic interaction network for Enhancers & Suppressors

Phenotypic Class

Enhanced by

Statement

Reference

osk¹ has grandchildless | dominant phenotype, enhanceable by Lasp^y45

(Suyama et al., 2009)

osk¹ has decreased cell number | embryonic stage 11 phenotype, enhanceable by Lasp^y45

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)10¹⁰

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)12¹²

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11^ETo3

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by mago^ETo2

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by vas^ETo14

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)13¹³

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)1¹

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)4⁴

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)5⁵

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)6⁶

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)8⁸

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)9⁹

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect | recessive phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11^ETo11

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Suppressed by

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has grandchildless | dominant phenotype, suppressible by Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6/Lasp^L.UASp

(Suyama et al., 2009)

NOT suppressed by

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has grandchildless | dominant phenotype, non-suppressible by Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6/Lasp^WA.UASp

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has grandchildless | dominant phenotype, non-suppressible by Lasp^S.UASp/Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Enhancer of

Statement

Reference

osk[+]/osk¹ is an enhancer of grandchildless | dominant phenotype of Lasp^y45

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Other

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has grandchildless | dominant phenotype

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | recessive | recessive | maternal effect phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk^ETo7/osk¹ has some die during embryonic stage | maternal effect phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Phenotype Manifest In

Enhanced by

Statement

Reference

osk¹ has ovary phenotype, enhanceable by Lasp^y45

(Suyama et al., 2009)

osk¹ has primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11 phenotype, enhanceable by Lasp^y45

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)10¹⁰/E(To)10[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)12¹²/E(To)12[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)12¹²/E(To)12[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)13[+]/E(To)13¹³

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)1¹/E(To)1[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)4[+]/E(To)4⁴

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)5⁵/E(To)5[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)5⁵/E(To)5[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)6⁶/E(To)6[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)8[+]/E(To)8⁸

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)9[+]/E(To)9⁹

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11^ETo11/Rab11[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11[+]/Rab11^ETo3

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by mago^ETo2/mago[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by vas^ETo14/vas[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)10¹⁰/E(To)10[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)12¹²/E(To)12[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)12¹²/E(To)12[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)13[+]/E(To)13¹³

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)1¹/E(To)1[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)4[+]/E(To)4⁴

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)5⁵/E(To)5[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)5⁵/E(To)5[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)6⁶/E(To)6[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)8[+]/E(To)8⁸

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by E(To)9[+]/E(To)9⁹

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11^ETo11/Rab11[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by Rab11[+]/Rab11^ETo3

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by mago^ETo2/mago[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype, enhanceable by vas^ETo14/vas[+]

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Suppressed by

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11 phenotype, suppressible by Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6/Lasp^L.UASp

(Suyama et al., 2009)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 has primordial germ cell phenotype, suppressible | partially by Dimm\osk^imm

(Jones and Macdonald, 2007)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 has embryo phenotype, suppressible | partially by Dimm\osk^imm

(Jones and Macdonald, 2007)

NOT suppressed by

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11 phenotype, non-suppressible by Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6/Lasp^WA.UASp

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11 phenotype, non-suppressible by Lasp^S.UASp/Scer\GAL4^oc.1.6

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Enhancer of

Statement

Reference

osk[+], osk¹, E(To)12¹², E(To)12[+] is an enhancer of embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype of Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Other

Statement

Reference

Lasp^y41/Lasp^y45, osk¹ has primordial germ cell | embryonic stage 11 phenotype

(Suyama et al., 2009)

Dimm\osk^imm, osk¹ has P granule phenotype

(Jones and Macdonald, 2007)

osk¹, par-1^k05603/par-1^k06323 has primordial germ cell phenotype

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

osk¹, par-1^k05603/par-1^k06323 has germline cell phenotype

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

osk[+]/osk¹, par-1^k05603/par-1^k06323 has primordial germ cell phenotype

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

osk[+]/osk¹, par-1^k05603/par-1^k06323 has germline cell phenotype

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk[+]/osk¹ has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Tm1^el4/Tm1^eg9, osk^ETo7/osk¹ has embryonic abdominal segment phenotype

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Additional Comments

Genetic Interactions

Statement

Reference

osk¹/+ females lacking both copies of Lasp^y45 show a penetrant grandchildless phenotype, with 20% of offspring displaying a complete absence of ovaries, and another 25% show only a single ovary.

Stage 11 embryos from osk¹/+ females lacking both copies of Lasp^y45 develop an average of 12 pole cells, much reduced compared to osk¹/+ animals.

Lasp^y45, osk¹/Lasp^y41 females have a grandchildless phenotype, which is rescued by expression of Lasp^{L.Scer\UAS.P\T} under the control of Scer\GAL4^otd. The number of pole cells is partially rescued, increasing to 25 pole cells in stage 11 embryos.

The grandchildless phenotype of Lasp^y45, osk¹/Lasp^y41 females is not rescued by expression of Lasp^{WA.Scer\UAS.P\T} or Lasp^{S.Scer\UAS.P\T} under the control of Scer\GAL4^otd. There is no increase in the number of pole cells observed in these embryos.

(Suyama et al., 2009)

armi¹ osk¹ and armi^72.1 osk¹ double mutant ovaries have microtubule defects that are cytologically identical to the armi single mutant phenotype.

(Cook et al., 2004)

Embryos derived from par-1^k06323/par-1^k05603 ; osk¹/+ females have an average of 3 pole cells/embryo (compared to 33 in the wild-type), and 42% of the embryos lack a germline.

(Riechmann et al., 2002)

66% of eggs derived from Tm1^eg9 +/Tm1^el4 osk¹ females do not develop into viable larvae. In 44% of the dead eggs, embryogenesis does not commence, or is terminated before cuticle formation, while 56% of the dead eggs have a characteristic "posterior group" phenotype with missing abdominal segments. The average number of abdominal segments per embryo is 0.69 (compared to the wild-type 8).

(Jankovics et al., 2001)

Xenogenetic Interactions

Statement

Reference

Expression of Dimm\osk^imm in embryos from osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 mothers rescues the body patterning and pole cell formation defects of these mutant embryos; fewer pole cells form than in wild-type embryos, but they are functional. The progression of polar granule development in Dimm\osk^imm; osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 embryos is like that seen in D. melanogaster until the cellular blastoderm stage, when the smaller granules accumulate in one area of the cell, so that by gastrulation each pole cell contains a single large aggregate of granule material, like that seen in D. immigrans embryos.

(Jones and Macdonald, 2007)

Complementation and Rescue Data

Fails to complement

osk¹⁸⁷

(Jenny et al., 2006)

osk^A87

(Jenny et al., 2006)

Rescued by

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 is rescued by osk^+tMa

(Morais-de-Sá et al., 2013)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 is rescued by osk^+t6.45

(Gunkel et al., 1998)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 is rescued by osk^M1L

(Gunkel et al., 1998)

Not rescued by

osk⁹/osk¹ is not rescued by osk^stop.UASp

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 is not rescued by osk^M1LΔ1

(Gunkel et al., 1998)

Comments

Expression of osk^t.WT in osk¹/Df(3R)p-XT103 mutant mothers results in embryos containing an average of 24 pole cells, as in wild-type.

(Morais-de-Sá et al., 2013)

Maternal osk^{stop.Scer\UAS.P\T} + Scer\GAL4^{mat.αTub67C.T:Hsim\VP16} fails to rescue the posterior group phenotype seen in cuticles of embryos laid by osk⁹/osk¹ mothers.

(Zimyanin et al., 2007)

Images (0)

Mutant

Wild-type

Stocks (0)

Notes on Origin

Discoverer

Comments

Abnormal localization of osk mRNA.

(Kim-Ha et al., 1991)

Strong allele of osk. The abdominal phenotype of osk can be rescued by cytoplasmic transplantation of wild type posterior pole plasm into the abdominal regions of mutant embryos.

(Lehmann and Nusslein-Volhard, 1991)

Prevents the posterior accumulation of G-iα65A protein.

(Wolfgang and Forte, 1995)

External Crossreferences and Linkouts ( 0 )

Synonyms and Secondary IDs (3)

Reported As

Symbol Synonym

osk54

(Kistler et al., 2018)

osk¹

osk⁵⁴

(Kilwein et al., 2025, Dold et al., 2020, Eichler et al., 2020, Lee et al., 2020, Ramat et al., 2020, Macdonald et al., 2016, Barckmann et al., 2015, Ryu and Macdonald, 2015, Wang et al., 2015, Gaspar et al., 2014, Tsai et al., 2014, Morais-de-Sá et al., 2013, Tanaka et al., 2011, Reveal et al., 2010, Rouget et al., 2010, Moore et al., 2009, Rangan et al., 2009, Suyama et al., 2009, Tanaka and Nakamura, 2008, Jones and Macdonald, 2007, Snee et al., 2007, Zimyanin et al., 2007, Zimyanin et al., 2007, Beckett and Baylies, 2006, Irion et al., 2006, Jenny et al., 2006, Munro et al., 2006, Zaessinger et al., 2006, Nabel-Rosen et al., 2005, Semotok et al., 2005, Szuperak et al., 2005, Cinnamon et al., 2004, Cook et al., 2004, Yano et al., 2004, Forrest and Gavis, 2003, Riechmann et al., 2002, Sinka et al., 2002, Jankovics et al., 2001, van Eeden et al., 2001, Clark et al., 2000, Shulman et al., 2000, Bergsten and Gavis, 1999, Chang et al., 1999, Gunkel et al., 1998, Wolff et al., 1998, Chen et al., 1997, Glotzer et al., 1997, Markussen et al., 1997, Rongo et al., 1997, Gavis et al., 1996, Nakamura et al., 1996, Smibert et al., 1996, Wilson et al., 1996, Markussen et al., 1995, Rongo et al., 1995, Wolfgang and Forte, 1995, Gavis and Lehmann, 1994, Liang et al., 1994, St. Johnston, 1993, Ephrussi and Lehmann, 1992, Gavis and Lehmann, 1992, Ephrussi et al., 1991, Kim-Ha et al., 1991, Lehmann and Nusslein-Volhard, 1991, St. Johnston et al., 1991, Tearle and Nusslein-Volhard, 1987)

Name Synonyms

Secondary FlyBase IDs

References (69)

Report Sections

Open Close